VOlUME 05 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2022
1Alvin Otniel Hartawidjaja, Kholis Roisah3, Achmad Busro
1,2,3Master of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i9-55Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to examine how the juridical consequences of errors on the part of hospitals and doctors in handling health care for patients. As for the subject of this study is how the legal relationship between Hospitals, Doctors and Patients in the health treatment agreement, and the legal consequences of errors and omissions in health care. The research method used in this study is normative juridical using secondary legal data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the legal relationship between the patient and the doctor is a “joint participation” relationship where the patient already feels equal to the doctor. Delay in treatment by a doctor is a form of default, namely being late in doing what was promised to be done. Hospitals can also be responsible in this case committing acts against the law, because they do not provide safe, quality, anti-discriminatory, and effective health services by prioritizing the interests of patients in accordance with hospital service standards, resulting in fatal outcomes for patients.
KEYWORDS:Juridical Consequences, Doctors, Hospitals, Patients
REFERENCES
1) Bahder Johan Nasution. 2005. Hukum Kesehatan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter. Surabaya: Rineka Cipta)
2) C.S.T Kansil. 1991. Pengantar hukum kesahatan Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
3) Hermien Hadiati Koeswadji. 1995. Segi - Segi Tanggung Jawab Hukum Rumah Sakit Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hubungan Dokter-Pasien. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga
4) Isfandyarie, Anny (2005). Malpraktek & Resiko Medik dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka
5) Isfanyarie, Anny (2006). Tanggung Jawab Hukum dan Sanksi Bagi Dokter: Buku I. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka
6) Kumalawati, Veronika, 2002. Peranan Informed Consent dalam Transaksi Terapeutik; Suatu Tinjauan Yuridis. Bandung: Citra Adhitya Bhakti,
7) Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Akibat Hukum Regulasi Tentang Thersold Dalam Pemiliham Umum Legislatif dan Pemilihan Presiden. Yudisial, 12(3), 34–59.
8) Amirudin, Z. A. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
9) Barzegarzadeh, A., Karveh, M. J., & Raisi, L. (2016). Principle of Legality and Its Relation with Customary Law in International Criminal Law. Mediterranean Journal of Social, 7(4), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5p398
10) Busro, A. (2018). Aspek Hukum Persetujuan Tindakan Medis (Inform Consent) Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan. Law Development And Justice Review, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3570
11) Depri Liber Sonata. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
12) Kaur, A., Scarborough, P., & Rayner, M. (2019). Regulating health and nutrition claims in the UK using a nutrient profile model: An explorative modelled health impact assessment. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0778-5
13) Mannas, Y. A. (2018). Hubungan Hukum Dokter Dan Pasien Serta Tanggung Jawab Dokter Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Kesehatan. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 6(1), 163–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v6i1.8274
14) P.Colin Bolger, G. D. W. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001